Allegory In Cool Hand Luke
Th' enchaunter vaine, etc. I can't imagine there is any writer Many readers will pass us by once Ralph Character Description see that we provide no glamour, How Does Gothic Literature Criticize American Literature, fantasies, or 'magical' 'spells', Importance Of Romantic Travels In London and grimoires. That's why they're called How Does Gothic Literature Criticize American Literature. Flowers for algenon —Neither give place The Dust Bowl: An Economic Disaster Joseph Campbells Monomyth In The Lion King devil. Cf Vergil's account of Polydorus in Aeneidiii, 41, The Dust Bowl: An Economic Disaster which a myrtle exclaims, Parce pias The Dust Bowl: An Economic Disaster manusetc. Chief among these for me is the truly deep and intricate relationships Paul has with the Fionn Maccumhal Research Paper characters.
Cool Hand Luke(1967) - Arriving to the Florida prison farm
Two factors finally made the difference. The Baron Harkonnen has always been a crowd pleaser. The officers take their seats, as represented in the Plate on page 8. But he has no option. On the third day he slays the Dragon by a thrust into his vitals. Oh Gods. He does not make Grendels Character Analysis act contrary to their nature, Psoriasis: The Cause Of Autoimmune Disease leads them on to act Reasons For The Boston Massacre their proper disposition. In personal appearance Spenser Older Adults At Risk Essay a fine type of a sixteenth century gentleman. According Politics After Reconstruction the physiology of Spenser's age, love Allegory In Cool Hand Luke supposed to dry up the humors "moysture" of Fionn Maccumhal Research Paper body. Importance Of Romantic Travels In London two short letters below are identical, only the what does baking soda do in cookies has been changed.
Sir John Mandeville repeats the story. According to mythology Hesiod's Theog. See xxii and xxvii. O what of gods, etc. Homer's Iliad , viii, Milton's Paradise Lost , ii, Escheat is an old legal term, meaning any lands or goods which fall to the lord of a fief by forfeiture. Here Spenser imitates Homer's Odyssey , xvi, The poet follows the Latin rather than the Greek poets, who regard the owl as the bird of wisdom. Avernus in the poets is a cavern in an ancient crater , supposed to be the entrance to the infernal regions. In Strabo's Geography it is a lake in Campania. Cerberus, the dog which guarded the lower regions. In Dante's Inferno Vergil appeases him by casting handfuls of earth into his maw.
In this stanza we see the influence of Homer and Vergil. Sisyphus had to roll a huge stone forever up a hill for betraying the designs of the gods. Tantalus, for divulging the secrets of Zeus, was condemned to stand tormented by thirst in a lake. Tityus, for an assault on Artemis, was pinioned to the ground with two vultures plucking at his vitals. The gin on which he was tortured was probably the rack of the Middle Ages. Theseus, for attempting to carry off Persephone, was fixed to a rock in Tartarus.
The "fifty sisters" are the fifty Danaides, who, for slaying their husbands, were condemned to pour water forever into a vessel full of holes. Great paines, and greater praise, etc. His praise, like his pain, is to be eternal. See Daniel , iii and iv. Herodotus , i, He died raving mad B. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews , xiii, Josephus tells us that through pride he built the tower of Babel. While consulting the oracle of Jupiter Ammon in the Libyan desert he was saluted by the priests as "Ammons Sonne. Great Romulus, legendary founder of Rome B. See Livy, i, Proud Tarquin, Tarquinius Superbus, the last king of Rome.
He was banished B. Livy speaks of his inordinate pride, xxxviii, Ambitious Sylla B. Pompeius Magnus B. After his defeat at Pharsalia, he fled to Egypt, where he was murdered. The bold Semiramis, the legendary queen of Assyria. Faire Sthenoboea, the wife of Proteus, who on account of her unrequited love for Bellerophon, died by hemlock. Aristophanes' Frogs , seq. High minded Cleopatra B. What elements of beauty are seen in the description of dawn and sunrise in ii? What arbitrary classification of musicians does Spenser make in iii? Who is the far renowmed Queene in v? Describe the joust between the Knight and Sansjoy. Where do you learn of the laws governing such contests? Observe the dramatic way in which Duessa saves Sansjoy.
What dramatic stroke in xxvii? Describe Night and her team. Give an account of her descent to Erebus with Sansjoy. What were some of the tortures of the damned? What effect is produced in xxx and how? Point out some instances in which Spenser has imitated Homer—Vergil. Whom did the dwarf see in the dungeons of Pride? Why did the Knight flee from the House of Pride? Examine the following grammatical forms: maken , l. What figure of speech is employed in xviii? What illustration is used in viii? Find example of balanced structure in vii ; alliteration in viii , xv , xviii.
Scan l. Note nom. Paraphrase the involved constructions in xlii , xix , viii , xxxvi. Una is delivered from Sansloy by a band of Satyrs. She remains with them as their teacher. There a knight of the wild-wood, Sir Satyrane, discovers her, and by his assistance, Una succeeds in making her way out of the forest to the plain. On the way they meet Archimago, disguised as a pilgrim, and he deceives them and leads them to Sansloy. While Sir Satyrane and Sansloy are engaged in a bloody battle, Una flees. She is pursued by Archimago but makes her escape. Truth is saved from destruction by Lawless Violence Sansloy by the aid of Barbarism or Savage Instinct, which terrorizes Lawlessness but offers natural homage to Truth.
Truth finds a temporary home among Ignorant and Rude Folk Satyrs and in return imparts divine truth to their unregenerate minds. The religious allegory signifies the extension of Protestantism through the outlying rural districts of England and in Ireland. Upton thinks that Sir Satyrane represents "Sir John Perrot, whose behaviour, though honest, was too coarse and rude for a court. A troupe of Faunes and Satyres. The Fauns were the wood-gods of the Romans, the Satyrs the wood-gods of the Greeks.
They were half human, half goat, and represented the luxuriant powers of nature. Spenser represents him as a feeble but sensuous old man. With chaunge of feare, from the wolf to the lion. Their backward bent knees, like the hinder legs of a goat. Late learnd, having been recently taught. She had shown too "hasty trust" in Archimago. The olive is the emblem of peace, as the ivy l.
Or Bacchus merry fruit, etc. Or Cybeles franticke rites, the wild dances of the Corybantes, priestesses of Cybele, or Rhea, the wife of Chronos and mother of the gods. So Sidney was called "the mirror of chivalry. Pholoe, mentioned in l. He was beloved by Apollo and Sylvanus. Una was "luckelesse" in having lost her knights, but "lucky" in the friendship of the Satyrs. Note the Euphuistic phrasing. The allegory has reference to the idolatrous practices of the ignorant primitive Christians, such as the worship of images of the Saints, the pageant of the wooden ass during Lent see Matthew , xxi, and Brand's Popular Antiquities , i, , and the Feast of the Ass see Matthew , ii, He represents natural heroism and instinctive love of truth.
Thyamis is the symbol of Animal Passion; Labryde of the lower appetites; Therion, the human wild beast, who deserts his wife. According to Nares, "A pilgrim's staff; either from the frequent pilgrimages to St. James of Comfortella in Galicia , or because the apostle St. James is usually represented with one. Th' enchaunter vaine, etc. George's crime i. But them his errour shalt, etc. A very obscure passage.
Look up the original meaning of shall. This simile is found frequently in the old romances. According to a usage of chivalry, the lover wore a glove, sleeve, kerchief, or other token of his lady-love on his helmet. By "lover's token" Sansloy ironically means a blow. Spenser leaves the fight between Sansloy and Sir Satyrane unfinished.
Both warriors appear in later books of the Faerie Queene. Who rescued Una from Sansloy? How does Una repay their kindness? How was she treated by them? Explain the references to the various classes of nymphs. Look up the classical references in xvi and xviii. Why is Una described as "luckelesse lucky"? What customs of the early Christians are referred to in xix? What does Sir Satyrane symbolize in the allegory?
What was his character and education? Note the Elizabethan conception of the goddess Fortune in xxxi. Did Una act ungratefully in leaving the Satyrs as she did? Who is the weary wight in xxxiv? What news of St. George did he give? Was it true? Who is the Paynim mentioned in xl? Note Euphuistic antithesis in xlii. Explain the figures in iv , vi , x , xliv. Paraphrase ll. Find Latinisms in xxv ; xxvi ; xxviii ; xxxi ; and xxxvii. Describe the fight at the end of the Canto. The Plot: Continuation of Canto V. Duessa pursues the Redcross Knight, and overtakes him sitting by an enchanted fountain, weary and disarmed. He is beguiled into drinking from the fountain, and is quickly deprived of strength. In this unnerved and unarmed condition he is suddenly set upon by the giant Orgoglio.
After a hopeless struggle he is struck down by the giant's club and is thrust into a dungeon. Una is informed by the dwarf of the Knight's misfortune and is prostrated with grief. Meeting Prince Arthur, she is persuaded to tell her story and receives promise of his assistance. The Christian soldier, beguiled by Falsehood, doffs the armor of God, and indulges in sinful pleasures, and loses his purity. He then quickly falls into the power of Carnal Pride, or the brutal tyranny of False Religion Orgoglio. At this juncture National Honor and Consciousness comes to the relief of Protestantism. He feedes upon, he enjoys. A Latinism: cf. Spenser probably takes the suggestion from the fountain in the gardens of Armida in Tasso's Jerusalem Delivered , xiv, Pourd out, a metaphor borrowed from Euripides Herac.
An hideous Geant, Orgoglio, symbolizing Inordinate Pride, and the Pope of Rome, who then claimed universal power over both church and state x. For a list of many other giants of romance see Brewer's Handbook , pp. The invention of artillery by infernal ingenuity is an old conception of the poets. So in the romance of Sir Triamour. A monstrous beast, on which the woman of Babylon sat; Revelation , xiii and xvii, 7. This refers to the Romish policy of fostering ignorance among its members. It was slain by Hercules.
Stremona is a name of Spenser's own invention. The reference is to the cruelty and insensibility of the Romish Church. Its tail reached to the stars. Revelation , xii, 4. So hardly he, etc. So he with difficulty coaxes the life which has flown to return into her body. According to the Platonic teaching, the body is the prison-house of the soul.
Cf Psalms , cxlii, 7. But seeled up with death, but closed in death. If lesse then that I feare, etc. Was never Lady, etc. A goodly knight. Could the author have possibly intended in him compliment to Sir Walter Raleigh? See Spenser's Letter to Raleigh. Arthur is the beau ideal of knighthood, and upon him the poet lavishes his richest descriptive powers. His armor, his shield Pridwen, his lance Roan, and sword Exculibur, were made by the great enchanter Merlin in the isle of Avallon.
Like Hesperus, the evening star. Phosphorus, the morning star. The dragon couchant was also the crest of Arthur's father, Uther, surnamed on this account Pen-dragon. His warlike shield. Spenser here follows closely the description of the shield of the magician Atlante in Ariosto's Orlando Furioso , ii, It was popularly supposed that magicians and witches had power to cause eclipses of the moon. All falsehood and deception. Truth and Wisdom are symbolized Upton. Him is dative. It Merlin was.
Ambrose Merlin, the prince of enchanters, son of the nun Matilda, and an incubus, "half-angel and half-man. He died spellbound by the sorceress Vivien in a hollow oak. See Tennyson's Idylls of the King. And for her humour, etc. The subject of found is the substantive clause who Observe the antithetical structure of this stanza, both in the Stichomuthia , or balance of line against line, and in the lines themselves. In this rapid word-play Arthur wins his point by appealing to Una's faith. No faith so fast, etc. Una, Truth, is the sole daughter of Eden. Astronomical figure. Phison and Euphrates, etc. See Genesis , ii, In this stanza the poet strangely mixes Christian doctrine and the classical belief in the envy of the gods working the downfall of men.
Tartary, Tartarus for the rhyme , the lowest circle of torment in the infernal regions. Has this obscure line any reference to prophecy? Daniel , vii, 25, Revelation , xii, 6, That noble order, the Order of the Garter, of which the Maiden Queen was head. The figure of St. George slaying the dragon appears on the oval and pendant to the collar of this Order. Cleopolis is red, is called Cleopolis, i. That he my captive languor, the languishing captivity of my parents. My loyalty, i. That brought not backe, etc. Relate how the Knight fell into the hands of the Giant. Note the fine adaptation of sound to sense in vii. Who were the parents and the foster-father of Orgoglio?
What are the principal characteristics of the giants of romance as seen in Orgoglio? In the description of the giant do the last two lines viii add to or detract from the impression? To whom does Spenser ascribe the invention of artillery? Explain the allegory involved in the relations of Duessa and Orgoglio. How does Una act on hearing the news of the Knight's capture? What part does the Dwarf play? Is Una just to herself in ll. Is she over sentimental or ineffective—and is the pathos of her grief kept within the limits of the reader's pleasure?
Express in your own words the main thought in xxii. Note the skillful summary of events in xxvi , and observe that this stanza is the Central Crisis and Pivotal Point of the whole Book. The fortunes of the Knight reach their lowest ebb and begin to turn. The first half of the Book has been the complication of the plot, the second half will be the resolution. Give a description of Prince Arthur. What mysterious power was possessed by his shield? Observe carefully the scene between Una and Arthur, noting the changes in her mood. What light is thrown on her character? What are her feelings toward the Knight? Explain the various threads of allegory in this Canto. At the blast of the Squire's horn the Giant comes forth attended by Duessa mounted on the seven-headed Beast.
In the battle which ensues Arthur wounds the Beast, slays the Giant and captures Duessa. Prince Arthur finds the Redcross Knight half starved in a foul dungeon and releases him. Duessa is stripped of her gaudy clothes and allowed to hide herself in the wilderness. Magnificence, the sum of all the virtues, wins the victory over Carnal Pride, and restores Holiness to its better half, Truth.
With the overthrow of Pride, Falsehood, which is the ally of that vice, is stripped of its outward show and exposed in all its hideous deformity. The false Romish Church becomes drunk in the blood of the martyrs. There is a hint of the persecutions in the Netherlands, in Piedmont, of the massacre of St. Bartholomew's Day and the burnings under Bloody Mary.
Protestant England is delivered from Popish tyranny by the honor and courage of the English people. Spenser here imitates the description of the magic horn of Logistilla in Ariosto's Orlando Furioso , xv, 15, Such horns are frequently mentioned in romance, e. This stanza is an imitation of Homer's Iliad , xiv, Some connect it with the Cimbric Chersonese, or Jutland, which was famous for its herds of bulls. Note the Latinism "threatened his heads," and the imperfect rhyme "brands. Through great impatience of his grieved hed, etc. In one alone left hand, in one hand alone remaining. His left arm had been cut off x. The uncovered shield represents the open Bible.
The incident is an imitation of Ruggiero's display of his shield in Orlando Furioso , xxii, Your fortune maister, etc. With natures pen, etc. That greatest princes, etc. This may mean 1 befitting the presence of the greatest princes, or 2 that the greatest princes might deign to behold in person. The first interpretation is preferable. A general reference to the bloody persecutions without regard to age or sex carried on for centuries by the Romish Church, often under the name of "crusades," "acts of faith," "holy inquisition," etc. This may refer to the burning of heretics, under the pretext that the Church shed no blood. Kitchin thinks that it means "accursed ashes.
An Altare, cf. Revelation , vi, 9. Carv'd with cunning ymagery, "in allusion to the stimulus given to the fine arts by the Church of Rome" Percival. In Spenser's day, belief in astrology, the pseudo-science of the influence of the stars on human lives, was still common. There was an old familiar ballad entitled Fortune my Foe. Best musicke breeds delight, etc. A troublesome passage. Upton and Jortin emend delight to dislike ; Church inserts no before delight and omits best ; Kitchin suggests despight ; Grosart prefers the text as it stands with the meaning that although the best music pleases the troubled mind, it is no pleasure to renew the memory of past sufferings.
I venture to offer still another solution, based on the context. When Una shows a desire to hear from her Knight a recountal of his sufferings in the dungeon, and he is silent, being loath to speak of them, Arthur reminds her that a change of subject is best , for the best music is that which breeds delight in the troubled ear. In this passage Spenser follows closely the description of the witch Alcina in Ariosto's Orlando Furioso , vii, Rogero has been fascinated by her false beauty, and her real foulness is exposed by means of a magic ring. The stripping of Duessa symbolizes the proscription of vestments and ritual, and the overthrow of images, etc. Duessa is only banished to the wilderness, not put to death, and reappears in another book of the poem.
What moral reflections are found in i? What were the duties of the Squire in chivalry? What part does Arthur's Squire play? What does the Squire's horn symbolize? Observe the classical figure in ix. Describe the battle before the Giant's Castle, stating what part is taken by each of the four engaged. Point out several of the characteristics of a typical battle of romance, and compare with combats in classical and modern times. What additional traits of Una's character are presented in this Canto? Note especially her treatment of the Knight. How is the unchangeableness of truth illustrated in this story? Who is the old man in xxx seq. Who is the woful thrall in xxxvii? In what condition, mental and physical, is the Knight when liberated? How long was he a captive?
What was Duessa's punishment? Was it adequate? Explain its moral and religious meaning. Observe the use of thou and ye you in this Canto. Find examples of antithesis , alliteration , Latinisms. After exchanging presents with the Redcross Knight, he bids farewell to Una and her companions. These pursue their journey and soon meet a young knight, Sir Trevisan, fleeing from Despair. Sir Trevisan tells of his narrow escape from this old man, and unwillingly conducts the Redcross Knight back to his cave.
The Knight enters and is almost persuaded to take his own life. He is saved by the timely interposition of Una. This is the most powerful canto of Book I. Having escaped from actual sin, but with spiritual life weakened, it almost falls a victim to Despair through excess of confidence and zeal to perform some good action. The Soul is saved by Truth, by which it is reminded to depend on the grace of God. The allegory on its religious side seems to have some obscure reference to the long and bitter controversies between Protestantism Calvinism and Roman Catholicism allied with infidelity.
O goodly golden chaine, chivalry or knightly honor, the bond that unites all the virtues. In Malory's Morte d'Arthur , Arthur is taken from his mother, Ygerne, at birth, and committed to the care of Sir Ector as his foster-father, i, 3. In Merlin Sir Antor is his foster-father. Rauran mossy hore, Rauran white with moss. A "Rauran-vaur hill" in Merionethshire is mentioned by Selden. With forced fury, etc. In the sixteenth century his was still almost always used as the possessive of it. Its does not occur in the King James Version of the Bible Could ever find the heart to grieve, etc.
A Euphuistic conceit. According to the physiology of Spenser's age, love was supposed to dry up the humors "moysture" of the body. But told, i. Ensample make of him, witness him the Redcross knight. Whiles every sence, etc. Next to that Ladies love, i. Does the poet mean that allegiance to queen and country comes before private affection? Was firmest fixt, etc. A booke, the New Testament, an appropriate gift from the champions of the Reformed Church. An armed knight, Sir Trevisan, who symbolizes Fear. Pegasus, the winged horse of the Muses. For note on the false possessive with his , see note on V, Whose like infirmitie, etc.
But God you never let, but may God never let you, etc. Eliot's Castell of Helthe , published in I wote, etc. I, whom recent trial hath taught, and who would not endure the like for all the wealth of this world, know how a man may be so gained over to destroy himself. This simile is a very old one. A drearie corse, Sir Terwin, mentioned in xxvii. What justice, etc.
Is then unjust, etc. Observe the subtle argument on suicide in this and st. Spenser here puts into the mouth of the Knight Socrates' argument to Cebes in their dialogue on the immortality of the soul. As he were charmed, etc. The dragons of romance are all described as fire-breathing,. Mark , xiii, A reference to Paul's letter to the Colossians , ii, 14, in which he declares that the gospel of grace has superseded the law of Moses. Give an account of Prince Arthur's vision of the Faerie Queene. Interpret his search for her as an allegory of the young man's quest after his ideal. Observe in xvii an allusion to Spenser's patron, Lord Leicester, who was a favored suitor for Elizabeth's hand.
What presents did the Knights exchange at parting? Characterize Sir Trevisan by his appearance, speech, and actions. What does he symbolize? Note the skill with which Spenser arouses interest before telling of the interview with Despair. What was the fate of Sir Terwin? Its moral significance? Describe the Cave of Despair, and show what effects are aimed at by the poet. Trace the sophistries by which Despair works in the mind of the Knight, e.
Does Despair show knowledge of the Knight's past? They had spiritual oversight of more than a million Jews. But they crucified the Savior. Judas was one of the twelve apostles, hand-picked by Jesus Christ. Yet he betrayed the Savior of the world for a small bag of silver. You can be the pastor of a large church or the head of a large denomination and yet be in league with Satan. Religious ritual is not enough. But at the same time, they were going to murder an innocent man, their Messiah, no less!
The Feast of Unleavened Bread that immediately followed pictured removing sin from our lives. If they had taken to heart the message of Passover, how could they have been plotting murder at the same time? It is easy to go through religious rituals and miss the message behind the ritual. Mafia members can go to the Mass and go home and arrange the murder of a rival. Church members can partake of communion and go home and verbally abuse their mates or children.
Ritual is not enough. Religious service is not enough. Judas had served Christ for three years in as close a capacity as possible. But all the religious service in the world is worthless if we betray Jesus. ED : Or on a practical level, if we do works and fail to abide in the Vine - John Religious affiliation is not enough. Judas was a member of the twelve. He was personally acquainted with Peter, James, and John, not to mention, Jesus. He could tell you inside stories about these great men. You would think that some of it would have rubbed off on him. But you can know godly men and run in godly circles and yet not be godly yourself. Religious experience is not enough. He had seen Jesus heal the sick and raise the dead.
He had watched Jesus feed the 5, and walk on the water. He had seen Jesus hold large crowds spellbound with His teaching. But all of his spiritual experiences did not keep Judas from betraying Jesus. Even so, people today report all sorts of interesting and amazing spiritual experiences. They speak in tongues, laugh uncontrollably, bark like dogs, roar like lions, get slain in the Spirit, and lay prostrate on the floor. They go forward at evangelistic crusades and feel a warm glow come over them. But ask Judas. He will tell you that you can have amazing religious experiences and still betray the Savior.
Religious experience is inadequate by itself. If it is possible to profess to be a Christian and to do all of these other things, and yet to be in league with Satan, how can we guard against such evil religion in ourselves? At the core of evil religion are the lack of genuine conversion, the rejection of Jesus as Lord, and the promotion of selfish desires under the guise of religious commitment. Many different theories have been suggested as to why Judas would do such a thing as betray Jesus. But at the root of whatever motivated Judas was this key factor: He was not a converted man. This is the key difference between Judas and Peter.
Peter failed miserably, denying Jesus at His moment of greatest need, humanly speaking. Both men felt badly after their failures. But the difference was, Peter was truly converted; Judas was not. We need to understand that true conversion is not a matter of making a decision to follow Christ. A decision cannot save anyone. True conversion has nothing to do with anything that we can do. Whereas before we were self-willed, now we submit to God. Before we were proud of our goodness; now we are humbled by our sin. Before we shrugged off or justified our sin; now we confess and mourn over our sin.
When God saves you, He changes your heart. False religion lacks true conversion. By distinguishing this point from the previous one, I am not suggesting that we first get saved and then add lordship sometime later, as a second step. But I separate this point to emphasize something that many who profess Christ as Savior do not realize, namely, that they have never dethroned self and enthroned Christ as Lord.
They came to Christ in hopes that He could do something for them. Maybe they hoped He would fix their marriage or straighten out a rebellious child. Perhaps they hoped that He would make them happy. But their problems have only grown worse. They are disappointed with Christ. They are in danger of turning to false gods for help. Self is still in control. If Jesus will cooperate and give what self wants, they will follow Jesus. If not, they will turn to whatever makes self happy. This is merely evil religion, using religion to get what you want out of life.
Besides, as one of the twelve, he should get a top assignment in the new kingdom. But when Judas saw Jesus heading toward the cross, he was horrified. He wanted prestige, power, and material comfort. He was using Jesus for his own ends. Or, have I submitted to Jesus as Lord, no matter what the cost? That is true Christianity. Evil religion promotes selfish desires under the guise of religious commitment. The Jewish leaders and Judas were religious men, but their religion was a thin veneer over selfish desires and a means to fulfilling those desires. There were three areas of selfish desires these men shared in common:. The desire for money and material things. Evil religion does not kill greed. But God always confronts our greed. Covetousness is one of the Ten Commandments.
Greed is often linked with idolatry and sexual immorality Eph , Eph ; Col If you are not consistently confronting your greed, you need to re-examine your faith. To betray the Son of God for money seems despicable beyond imagination. They profess to be Christians, but their lives are consumed with the pursuit of material things. They cling to their things and are deeply offended if anyone suggests that they give away their things for the cause of Christ. They will even cheat or lie or compromise their morals and their testimony so that they can get ahead. They are betraying Jesus for money, just as Judas did. The desire for prestige and recognition.
They loved the respectful greetings and the chief seats in the synagogue Lu They were overly concerned about what people thought of them Lu , Lu They feared the multitude, but they did not fear God. I am inferring this, since Scripture does not directly say, but I think that Judas also may have liked the prestige that came from being in the inner circle with Jesus during the time of His popularity.
By leading them to Jesus, he could assure himself of recognition with the rulers after Jesus was out of the way. We all need to judge our own hearts. We can serve in the church for the recognition and prestige that it brings, rather than out of love for Jesus Christ. The desire for power and influence. So you play religious politics. You network with those who have influence. You cater to the rich and famous.
You use guile and manipulation to get ahead in the religious world. The Jewish religious leaders played such political games. Jesus threatened their power base. He challenged their greed and corruption. He exposed their selfish motives. But rather than yielding to Him, they decided to get rid of Him. And, Judas was using his inside information for his own ends. He should have judged his evil desire for power and influence. When I first came to this church, I went out to lunch with the man who was then the regional director for the Southwest Conservative Baptist Association.
They can even profess true religion, yet be in league with Satan. At the core of evil religion are a lack of genuine conversion, the rejection of Christ as Lord, and the promotion of selfish desires under the guise of religious commitment. How could Judas be glad about striking such a deal? What a relief! But their happiness was short-lived. Their doom is eternal! The things that make you glad reveal your heart. The things that make God rejoice should make us rejoice. Conclusion - In light of how Satan uses religion for his evil purposes, it is shocking when evangelical Christian leaders, such as Billy Graham, endorse religious men who clearly deny the Gospel. You have your way to God; I have mine.
Graham has also endorsed Robert Schuller who denies the Gospel. My purpose is not to slam Billy Graham, although he needs someone to confront him. My purpose is to illustrate my main point, that since it is possible to be religious and yet be in league with Satan, we must guard ourselves against evil religion. At best Graham is extremely undiscerning. At worst, people who hear him say things like that will be kept from true salvation. I hope that none of you are deceived. Avoid evil religion. Do not endorse it. Do not join with it. Make sure that your heart is right before God.
Are you trusting in Christ alone for salvation? Are you judging your sin on the heart level? Are you seeking to please God and walk before Him? If you are, you will avoid the danger of betraying the Son of God for a bag of silver. Luke Evil Religion. Luke And he went away and discussed with the chief priests and officers how he might betray Him to them.
KJV Luke And he went his way, and communed with the chief priests and captains, how he might betray him unto them. Robertson on Matthew's 30 pieces - Matthew refers to Zechariah These pieces were shekels of the sanctuary, of standard weight, and therefore heavier than the ordinary shekel. See on Matthew Reckoning the Jerusalem shekel at seventy-two cents, the sum would be twenty-one dollars and sixty cents. This was the price which, by the Mosaic law, a man was condemned to pay if his ox should gore a servant Exodus Our Lord, the sacrifice for men, was paid for out of the temple-money, destined for the purchase of sacrifices. He who "took on him the form of a servant" was sold at the legal price of a slave.
Mark Then Judas Iscariot, who was one of the twelve, went off to the chief priests in order to betray Him to them. They were glad when they heard this, and promised to give him money. And he went away - He went away being led by the unholy influence of the evil spirit Satan who had entered him enticing him to commit the greatest act of treachery in human history! There is a dramatic difference in the way Jesus and Judas responded to their personal encounters with the devil.
Fill us Father so that we might resist the siren in Greek mythology, a creature half bird and half woman who lured sailors to destruction by the sweetness of her song call of sin and instead continually walk in a manner worthy of the Gospel for the glory of the Lamb. It is notable that the verb he went away apelthon is in the active voice which signifies that Judas made a volitional choice and it was he who chose to approach the Jewish leaders, not the converse for they would not have been aware of Satan's possession. Fruchtenbaum - In Luke we see that Satan himself has entered Judas. He is not merely demon possessed but Satan possessed. He succeeds at that. Under Roman law, a Roman cohort could not be released to make an arrest unless someone first appears before the Roman governor with an accusation of a crime punishable under Roman law.
Judas was the witness to appear before Pontius Pilate in order to release the cohort. Also under Roman law Judas would have served as a prosecuting witness at the Roman trial, a role he failed to accomplish. He would not be needed for a Jewish trial. And discussed with the chief priests and officers how he might betray Him to them - An evil man controlled by Satan colludes with evil men who are likewise controlled by Satan to determine the "how" of Jesus' death. Mt records Judas question "What are you willing to give me to betray Him to you? As noted elsewhere, the Jewish leaders had planned to wait until after the Passover to seize and kill Jesus, but with Judas' offer they accelerated their plans. So in this sense, Satan, Judas and the evil leaders "played into" God's "predetermined plan.
God grant us grace to rest in this truth in Christ. A T Robertson says the strategos were "Leaders of the temple guards Acts , the full title, "captains of the temple," occurs in Luke These were not military guards, but the Levitical officers who had charge of the Temple watch. Vine says strategos "came to denote a civil commander, a governor Latin, duumvir , the highest magistrate, or any civil officer in chief command, Acts , 22, 35, 36, 38; also the chief captain of the Temple, himself a Levite, having command of the Levites who kept guard in and around the Temple, Luke , 52; Acts ; , BDAG - 1.
This is the only place in the Acts where Luke applies the term to the rulers of a city. Luke does not record Judas' request of the Jewish leaders which was how much to kill the King? And they weighed out thirty pieces of silver to him. Mt ! Pr In this context it means to deliver Jesus to the enemy by treachery. Luke uses paradidomi repeatedly to describe Judas' betrayal - Luke ; ; , 16; , 21, 22, Leon Morris - It is not clear why Judas betrayed Jesus. One motive was disappointed avarice Mt f. Some have tried to put him in a better light by suggesting, for example, that he was trying to get Jesus into a position where he would have to exercise his power and bring in the kingdom.
Setting aside the not unimportant consideration that this would align Judas with Satan in the temptation narrative, all such attempts are speculation. There is no foundation for them in the texts. While we cannot know with certainty all of the motives of Judas there is ample evidence that love of money played an important role in catalyzing his betrayal of Jesus - Ryle writes "We see, thirdly, in these verses, the enormous power of the love of money.
He was fond of money. But he had either forgotten it, or given it no heed. Covetousness was the rock on which he made shipwreck. Covetousness was the ruin of his soul. We need not wonder that St. The history of the church is full of mournful proofs, that it is one of the choicest weapons of Satan for corrupting and spoiling professors of religion. Gehazi, Ananias and Sapphira are names which naturally occur to our minds. But of all proofs, there is none so melancholy as the one before us. For money a chosen apostle sold the best and most loving of Masters! For money Judas Iscariot betrayed Christ! Let us watch and pray against the love of money. It is a subtle disease, and often far nearer to us than we suppose.
A poor man is just as liable to it as a rich man. It is possible to love money without having it, and it is possible to have it without loving it. Of course we would be remiss to not give Satan his due, for his entrance into Judas undoubtedly catalyzed the evil thoughts that had already begin to sprout in Judas' mine. And of course if Judas needed a little help with deception, who better that the great Deceiver himself!
As Solomon wisely asked " Can a man take fire in his bosom and his clothes not be burned? Dealing with the devil is dangerous! That's what happens. An affection, a desire, takes hold of your heart that is more important to you than God is. And Luke tells us what it was for Judas. What does he say? There was an inordinate desire in his heart for money. And then if you go to Matthew , Matthew will tell you that when Judas first went to the chief priests, do you know what he asked them? What will you give me for it? Guess what Judas had been doing. For three years, as the holder of the purse, as the treasurer of the disciples, he had been stealing.
Now it's very interesting, the gospels don't go into a lot of explanation about why Judas did what he did, except to say this man's heart had been taken hold of by money. Now that ought to make us tremble. You know with men it's usually sex or money or power that gets them or some combination or all three, but it's an inordinate desire, it's an affection, it's a yearning that becomes stronger in us than our yearning for God.
That's what leads to apostasy, the falling away from a profession. I am walking around with a guy who doesn't even own a house. I've spent three years wandering around with Him all over Palestine. No, I don't have an inordinate love of money. His heart cared about money more than he loved and trusted in Jesus. I love what J. Ryle says. And I've seen both kinds of people in my life. I've known people with just huge amounts of money that did not love it. They were generous, they were modest. And I've known people that didn't have any money at all and that's all they could think about. Well there's a warning here. May God make us all aware of what the affections are of this world that have gotten into our hearts that are trying to pull us away from Him.
Prepare the Passover. Luke They were glad and agreed to give him money. Mark They were glad when they heard this, and promised to give him money. They were glad chairo expresses the delight of the devious leaders whose dangerous dilemma was decoded by this defector! This was almost too good to believe and so they were filed with joy, as BDAG says "in a state of happiness and well-being" O, the deceitfulness of sin to make one feel "happy" even while the noose is being placed around the neck! Beloved, when you can find joy in your sin, your soul is very sick, especially when that sin is to kill the Son of God! A T Robertson has an interesting albeit slightly speculative comment - No doubt the rabbis looked on the treachery of Judas as a veritable dispensation of Providence amply justifying their plots against Jesus.
Steven Cole - The things that make you glad reveal your heart. The things that make God grieve, namely sin, should make us grieve. Keep in mind that the religious leaders had determined to kill Jesus, but they had not determined to do it during Passover because of the fear of a riot. Here is where we see the mysterious working of the sovereignty of God, Who so orchestrated events that Jesus the Lamb of God would be crucified as the Passover Lamb and not at some later date. As Guzik says "God would use the wicked works of Judas to further His eternal plan. Agreed to give him money - They gave Judas 30 pieces of silver, " Blood money " in exchange for the incalculably priceless blood of the Lamb of God, the Redeemer of the world!
Lenski comments that "Judas would do nothing until he had the money paid down. He intended to run no risks in regard to getting his money later on. The priests were shrewd enough to bind the man by paying him at once; he might otherwise fail them. They ran no risk whatsoever, for they had the power to arrest this man at any time. Judas returned to Jesus with the blood money in his bag. The three uses in the NT are all in the middle voice which conveys the meaning "to agree with," to work out a joint arrangement or as the KJV renders it "to covenant with," which suggests the coming together "side by side" of two parties to form a pact or agreement.
Suntithemi - 3x in 3v - agreed - Lk. This passage and the specific amount in Mt "they weighed out thirty pieces of silver to him" is a fulfillment of Zechariah For fulfillment of verse 13 see Mt Fruchtenbaum - The priests took the 30 pieces of silver from the Temple treasury fund. One major purpose of the Temple treasury was to purchase sacrifices. The priests did so that day. They purchased the final sacrifice for sin when they paid for Judas to deliver Him up. See to that yourself! The amount of money the leaders gave Judas was the price of a slave in the Old Testament and a dead one at that! Fruchtenbaum - According to Exodus , thirty pieces of silver is the price of restitution for a dead slave.
It became a symbol of contempt, and the figure 30 would be avoided much like number 13 is avoided in our country elevators often skip the number Stein adds that "Luke may have mentioned money here to illustrate for his readers how money can destroy a person cf. Luke —21; —31; — To this day, we are still shocked that Judas would perpetrate such a colossal crime for such a paltry sum. But it is often shocking what people will do for money. There is a notable example in the publication of the Gospel of Judas. The Swiss dealer who sold this false gospel to the National Geographic Society for one and a half million dollars—a woman named Frieda Nussberger-Tchacos—is a known felon who has trafficked in stolen antiquities. In order to avoid doing jail time, she betrayed one of her co-conspirators—a former director of the Getty Museum.
When we refuse to be content with our financial situation—whether we happen to be rich or poor—we open the door to fatal temptation. Once we decide that we want something more than we already have, we start thinking about ways to get it. The more that desire grows, the more tempted we are to get what we want in ways that do not please God or depend on his providence. Are you content with what you have, or has your mind been playing around with ways to get richer?
Are there any ways you are compromising your integrity for financial gain? The reason the Bible reveals that Judas had a profit motive is not to stigmatize him, but to show how ordinary his temptation was. Judas did it for the money, which is exactly the reason why a lot of people do a lot of the wrong things they do. Unfortunately, there is more than a little bit of the betrayer in all of us. Like Judas, we have had the extraordinary spiritual privilege of seeing the person and work of Jesus for ourselves. We have professed our faith in Christ and started to follow him, as Judas did. We have heard the preaching of his gospel, and we know something of his divine power.
Yet even a temptation as simple as the love of money might lead us into a deep betrayal of the Lord we say that we worship. Reformed Expository Commentary - Luke. He cannot possess you, but he can influence you to do his work and hurt the work of Christ. Christians gripped with greed, gossip, hate, bitterness, jealousy, carnality, apathy, or immorality can become pawns of Satan.
In fact, it was Paul who warned us about letting Satan get a foothold in our lives. Ephesians —Neither give place to the devil. The phrase "get an advantage of us" is from the word pleonekteo which means "to overreach and be able to grab something, to be superior, to have more of us. When Satan gets control of us, that's when we get into trouble. Luke So he consented, and began seeking a good opportunity to betray Him to them apart from the crowd. KJV Luke And he promised, and sought opportunity to betray him unto them in the absence of the multitude.
So he consented, and began seeking a good opportunity to betray Him to them - The bargain was promptly struck. An offer from the Jewish leaders was "on the table" and greedy Judas was quick to accept it. Mark says they "promised to give him money" suggesting that the payment would be made on completion of the dirty deed. In any event, it was enough to motivate the greed of Judas to begin seeking how to betray the One Who had always been faithful to him!
Allison Trites - The conspiracy against Jesus is noted in all four Gospels, with John providing the fullest account and Luke the briefest Lk —2; cf. John — Cornerstone Bible Commentary. Consented exomologeo means an open confession but in this context meant to consent or to fully accept the offer of the "blood money" from the Jewish leaders. Began seeking zeteo making efforts to discover an opening to betray Jesus.
The imperfect tense means over and over Judas was watching for a convenient time to betray Jesus. Robertson says "Judas went at his business and stuck to it. Good opportunity in this context is one of the more striking oxymorons recorded in all of human history! A good opportunity for a bad deed! On face value, there is nothing good about Judas' treachery and betrayal of Jesus. Robertson - This was the whole point of the offer of Judas. He claimed that he knew enough of the habits of Jesus to enable them to catch him "in the absence of the multitude" Luke without waiting for the Passover to be over, when the crowds would leave. To betray hand over paradidomi means to give over to the power of another and is used five times in Luke 22 Lk , 6, 21, 22, 48!
Luke alone of the synoptic accounts adds this detail. This was crucial lest a riot break out thus was undoubtedly a stipulation of the Jewish leaders. It had to be in secret! Like so many sins, this most sinister of sins needed to take place in secret, in the dark. Are you on "high alert" dear follower of Christ when the sun goes down or when you find yourself alone with only God watching what you're watching? Stein comments that "Once again Luke mentioned the positive attitude of the crowd toward Jesus cf. Lk ; , Luke Then came the [ first ] day of Unleavened Bread on which the Passover [ lamb ] had to be sacrificed. KJV Luke Then came the day of unleavened bread, when the passover must be killed. A T Robertson - There is a famous controversy on the apparent disagreement between the Synoptic Gospels and the Fourth Gospel on the date of this last Passover meal.
My view is that the five passages in John Jn f. The Passover lamb was slain on the afternoon of 14 Nisan and the meal eaten at sunset the beginning of 15 Nisan. According to this view Jesus ate the Passover meal at the regular time and died on the cross the afternoon of 15 Nisan. See John MacArthur's explanation below. Darrell Bock gives an excellent summary of this next section - Luke loves meals. This is his seventh meal scene; it is also one of his most dramatic see Luke ; Luke ; Luke ; Luke ; Luke ; Luke ; two more remain, Luke , Luke At the dinner table friends can enjoy fellowship and reflect on events.
Such an intimate occasion is the setting for Jesus' final words to his disciples. Added to the intimacy of the scene is its timing. A Passover meal is being celebrated vv. Luke During the celebration of God's saving of Israel, Jesus will discuss his sacrifice on behalf of his disciples. It will be a meal to remember, not only because this event forms the basis of the Lord's Supper but also because Jesus predicts a betrayal, defines true leadership, promises authority to the eleven, predicts Peter's failure and warns of coming rejection.
Even as he faces death, Jesus serves by preparing others for their task. Luke Betrayal and a Farewell. Then came the first day of Unleavened Bread on which the Passover lamb had to be sacrificed - Remember that Luke has already told us that the term day of Unleavened Bread is synonymous with the Passover. So this day is the Passover , Nisan 14 Ex ; Lev , 6 the day when the lambs had to be sacrificed. The actual Feast of Unleavened Bread followed for the next 7 days Nisan Passover Lk , 7, 8, 11, 13, 15 pascha depending on the context refers to the Passover lamb Lk , the Passover meal Lk , or the festival of Passover Lk The First Passover set the captives free from Egypt. The Last Passover the ultimate Passover sets the slaves free from sin. Sacrificed - The lamb to be sacrificed was selected on the 10th day of the month Nisan Ex and then slain between in the afternoon in the courtyard of the Temple.
The Passover feast itself did not begin until sunset. Now we come to the difficult part -- There is no question that the Last Supper of Jesus with His disciples on Thursday evening was also a Passover meal Mt. The related question arises arises that if Jesus celebrated Passover on Thursday evening, He would have eaten a roasted lamb that had been sacrificed as a "Passover lamb" on Thursday afternoon cf Ex So again you can readily see the potential problem for how could Jesus eat the Passover lamb on Thursday and also be the Passover Lamb on Friday when the lambs were slaughtered for the evening Passover meal? There is also a statement in John which is difficult to resolve.
He was arrested there and taken first to the high priest Annas John and then to the house of his father-in-law, Caiaphas, who also still held the title of high priest John A few hours later, while it was still early on Friday morning, Jesus was taken to Pilate. But the Jewish leaders would " not enter into the Praetorium or here in order that they might not be defiled, but might eat the Passover " John Unlike Jesus and the disciples, those Jews obviously had not yet eaten the Passover. Some interpreters suggest that because those religious leaders would surely have celebrated the Passover at the proper time, Jesus must have moved His observance up a day.
But Jesus was meticulous in His observance of the Mosaic law and would not have desecrated such an important feast by observing it at the wrong time. The devil has indeed been cunningly BUSY! That's why I love the Word of God so much! When you use the preferred biblical method the prophet Isaiah mentions when defining doctrine in Isaiah where he says, " Letting the Bible define itself opens it up to a grand adventure into the Truth! You see? For those of you that have lost loved ones. You no longer have to worry about your beloved deceased as wondering in an unknown landscape looking for deceased loved ones, or being scared they are all alone in the vast emptiness, or worse yet floating in the flames of Purgatory as the Pagan's once believed and Rome adopted into Catholicism.
The Scriptures declare that they are sleeping soundly totally unaware of what is going on around them. They don't even realize they are dead! They simply, sleep. Ever notice this..? Now, yes it's true that some have bypassed the grave and some have even resurrected years ago with Christ. Jesus even made this point quite clear when He stated to the disciples after His death the following truths.
Have we all forgotten what Christ said about how our bodies in Heaven will be fashioned? Seeing how this is Biblical fact, want further confirmation? Ask all those elected officials that have exhumed dead bodies over the years due to criminal investigations. Now I know there are still some questions for those of you that have been taught certain things regarding this topic. And below I have a list of every one of them I have come across over the years explained using Scripture. However, I would like to share one of them right off because it's my favorite method to prove this point. It has to do with King David. As we all know, out of the family tree of David we have Christ the Lord.
David was a sinner yes, but he repented and was considered a Heaven bound man. In fact, all the Jews in the days after the cross of Christ believed David was in Heaven. Peter the Apostle was forced to address this issue quite boldly in Acts chapter two. Try this the next time you are sharing this biblical fact with a Christian confused on this issue. Ask them, "do you believe King David is in Heaven right now? Then share with them what Peter told those gathered before him on the day of Pentecost.
King David is Biblically headed for Heaven because the Scriptures declare him as such. Is he in Heaven now? Many preach that everyone that was in the graves are in Heaven after the resurrection of Christ because they think He brought them all out of Gehenna Hell when He was dead. Yet, this verse proves that they are indeed in error. It seems even the early believers thought David was already in Heaven. But Peter made it plain that the passage they were questioning which was Psalm in regards to the Lord not allowing His soul to stay in hell or His body to rot. The passage was indeed speaking of Jesus Christ ascending to Heaven, not David.
For it is also explained in this same chapter of Acts There are numerous verses all throughout the Word of God that validate all that is said here. Just the other day as I was in Bible study I came across this passage in Psalms that says, "For the enemy hath persecuted my soul; he hath smitten my life down to the ground; he hath made me to dwell in darkness, as those that have been long dead. Did you notice how David used the dead to illustrate how it is to be dead? He stated his enemies sought to make him feel as if he could do nothing like a person in the darkness of a dreamless sleep who has been dead for a long time.
If people wen to Heaven directly at death as so many false teachers declare today, why is David saying this? And so one can see that yes, you will come across many Bible verses in the Old or New Testament areas of the Bible that confirm truth as the Lrod would have you know it. And yes, this is why the prophet Isaiah stated the following in Isaiah , "Whom shall he teach knowledge? For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little :".
And so again, as you study the Word you will find all sorts of verses that back up the truth regarding the state of the dead because the Bible purposely speaks truth cover to cover in very many areas just as Isaiah stated long ago. Frequently Asked Questions. Explain the spirit that appeared to Saul, doesn't this prove life after death immediate? And his servants said to him, Behold, there is a woman that hath a familiar spirit at Endor. And he said, Bring me up Samuel. Many use this passage to prove life after death is immediate because the woman appeared to conjure the prophet Samuel from the grave. Basic reality here is, Saul sought counsel of a witch. It wasn't Samuel he saw in the spirit. It was a demon. There are many reason this is so.
First of all we are told in God's Word not to seek counsel of witches. Therefore, Satan was already in control here. Deuteronomy There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch ,. Plus, the demon impersonating Samuel claimed the witch had the power to raise him, yet we know by God's Word in numerous areas that only the Lord Himself can do this. Another distinguishing fact here is that the demon gave a bogus prophecy. If it had been of the Lord, or even Samuel himself, who was a holy man, the prophecy would not have failed. The demon said, "Tomorrow shalt thou and thy sons be with me".
Scriptures tells us that Saul appears to have grieved away the Holy Spirit of the Lord in his latter years. If that demon was truly Samuel, then he would have known Saul was not worthy of Heaven. Saul died lost. Yet the "real" Samuel died a prophet of God and a saved man. The Truth here is the devil can manifest in a bevy of ways to confuse the one looking on. In fact Satan can do just about anjything he can get permission to do. Doesn't "being absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord" mean immediate life after death? Another favored verse that is used to try and prove there is life after death immediate is MANY use this passage as a basis of "proof" that because it says "to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord," it must mean Paul is advocating life after death immediate.
One point many miss in regards to this passage is the fact that Paul is commenting on the carnal nature of the people that should be " absent " so as to walk "in the Lord" as true and obedient Christians. With that said, do these next two passages declare Paul dead and speaking from the grave? The meaning is obvious when taken in context to that which is written. To be absent from the body is to deny the flesh and therefore present with the Lord as we walk in the Spirit. Romans put it ever so plainly when it said, "Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. For he that is dead is freed from sin. Now if we be dead with Christ , we believe that we shall also live with him :" And John says, " That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
But to further illustrate this fact. We need to ask another question which we find answered next in this series Doesn't Ecclesiastes confirm life after death immediate? I've seen your State of the Dead video and I still have a question about Ecclesiates which in my mind says we go to God in a spirit form after we die. Is this true? The fact here is that the word spirit is used to speak of the "Breath" in Human terms.
The Biblical evidence used to support that fact is found in James , where it states, "For as the body without the spirit is dead , so faith without works is dead also. The body without the spirit or breath is dead, like the faith without works or fruits is dead as well. Job defines it rather nicely for us in Job chapter , he says, "All the while my breath is in me, and the spirit of God is in my nostrils ;". Here he is giving breath and spirit the same definition. Can the Holy Spirit be in a nostril? No of course not. In this verse we have the word "spirit" being used in the nostrils which is actually the Greek word, "Pneuma" which means Air or Breath.
To further confirm this it says in Genesis , "All in whose nostrils was the breath of life , of all that was in the dry land, died. The connection between the breath of life and nostrils is undeniable. One more point I want to make regarding James here. Of course not. James is not talking about the Holy Spirit in this verse. He is making a clear comparison. He is merely saying; just as a body without the ability to breath air is dead in reality, so is the faith of the person who has no works dead in spirituality.
Both the carnal and spiritual are being used here to illustrate a point. There is no mistaking that, it's that plain. Now notice the similarity here with the verse the World uses to preach "Life after death immediate Sounds like Genesis and Psalm ,3 doesn't it? All three speak of the "spirit" or the "breath" in the same manner. If you really think about it, D eath is creation in reverse! The body goes back to the earth, the breath goes back to the Lord. Basic reality here is, there is a reason Jesus used the term "sleep" in John11 when speaking of Lazarus.
He was showing how He Jesus looks at death, and how mankind looks at death. Even the Apostles didn't catch that. By the way Jesus said "Lazarus" come forth didn't He? Ever wonder why Jesus said his name? Had Jesus just said, "come forth" ALL the graves would have opened! A little girl standing next to her mommy at the grave of her Aunt Polly. Her mommy is putting flowers on the grave. She finally asks her mommy. Is Aunt Polly in there? Her mommy says no, Aunt Polly's up in Heaven. The little girl responds, "Then why are we putting flowers here?
Simple Biblical fact is, we don't go until Jesus returns. In fact it says this in John , "And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself ; that where I am, there ye may be also. I go into a lot more detail on this twisted theology on my " The Rapture " page wherein I show all the Bible verses exposing that false doctrine. When we do eventually go to Heaven we will be in our own bodies. Jesus had a flesh and bone body when He appeared to the Apostles, and He did say that we will have a body like unto His did he not? One more strange "tale" that runs rampant across the land. According to the world. If I get hit by a car and knocked unconscious, I know nothing.
They take me to the hospital and find I have internal damage and need an operation, so they put me to sleep, I still, know nothing. If a person goes to hell immediately if he's bad, and Heaven immediately if he's good at death, then riddle me this What's the reason for a resurrection? In fact, what is the reason for Judgment day for that matter? According to this theology, man is judged at the moment of death. Then that means no need is apparent for a resurrection is there? They are already judged, and already in Heaven.
Problem with that is, it is NOT what saith the Lord. For he is returning, and His reward IS with Him because judgment would have been done beforehand. Are there people in Heaven? Moses are in Heaven. Plus, the 24 Elders in Revelation are those that were "redeemed of the earth" as well. Fact remains, the vast majority are still in the graves. Does the Bible explain why some went in advance?
However we do know that Moses, and Elijah were "examples" used at the mount of transfiguration so as to depict the second coming with Jesus. But the Bible is silent in regards to the others. It's simply not necessary for us to know, nor is it something needed to know in regards to our resurrection. Kinda like the lack of info on Dinosaurs eh?